Cluster foundation
Networking, ingress, storage, node pools sized to the workload, and isolation so one hungry service cannot starve the rest.
The cluster underneath, the architecture, the services that do the work, the data moving through them, the integrations outward, and the operations that keep it standing. Splitting it across vendors is where the expensive failures come from.
Kubernetes across as many hosts as the workload needs, wired into one cluster and described entirely in code. The fundamentals — metrics, logs, scheduling, isolation — come from the platform rather than being rebuilt per project.
Networking, ingress, storage, node pools sized to the workload, and isolation so one hungry service cannot starve the rest.
Any number of machines — cloud, on-premise or mixed — joined into a single cluster that behaves as one system.
The same deployment shape works for any product type, so a new system starts from a known-good base instead of a blank page.
Every environment lives in a repository and is reconciled continuously. A rollback is a revert; staging cannot silently drift.
Autoscaling tuned against real traffic, plus a straight answer about what the cluster costs and what to do about it.
RBAC that follows real roles, secrets kept out of manifests, network policies, image provenance and an audit trail.
The part that decides whether your system stays changeable. Boundaries drawn along real seams in the business, contracts that are versioned and tested, and a shape that can be edited later without a rewrite.
The main nodes of the data flow are the part that has to be understood up front. Everything else can be added later; a stream that stalls or silently loses records cannot be patched over.
Connectors to sources, vendors and your existing systems, with backpressure, safe retries and detection of the gaps nobody would otherwise notice.
Relational, time-series, columnar, document — picked for this product and this data, since it is the decision most expensive to reverse.
Continuous services for the steady stream, scheduled jobs for the periodic work, each with its own resources and failure handling.
Multi-stage work chained so a failure stops at its stage, reports clearly, and resumes without redoing everything upstream.
The paths between parts — queues, streams and direct calls — sized so throughput holds under the worst hour of the month.
Schema validation that alarms on drift, replayable history where it matters, and a clear line between data you can recompute and data you cannot.
A microservice is a natural home for a model: it has the data, the contract and the monitoring already. From there the useful move is usually not another dashboard — it is putting the answer where your people are already working.
The services that do the actual work, plus whatever interface the product needs to be usable. We build the UI as a component of the system — and we do not take interface work detached from a system we are building.
Each in the language that fits it — Go, Python, TypeScript or whatever the job calls for — with a small scope, an explicit contract, its own tests and metrics.
Dashboards, internal tools and operator screens, built to the shape of the data rather than the other way round.
The systems you already run, connected in rather than replaced for the sake of it.
Contract tests at every seam, integration tests over the flows, load tests against the worst hour, and acceptance with your people before anything is called done.
You cannot operate what you cannot see. Observability is designed with the feature, not retrofitted after the first incident nobody could explain.
Metrics, logs and traces sharing correlation IDs across every service in the cluster.
Alerts that mean something, map to a runbook, and reach a human before a customer does.
The cluster, the code, the documentation and the reasoning — delivered complete and yours.
Ongoing operation and development if you want it. Never something we design you into needing.
Defaults, not dogma. The stack follows the product, and languages are chosen per service, not per company — containers make that free. If your team already runs something that works, we would rather learn it than replace it.
A short, focused engagement. We read the system, the infrastructure and the incident history, then tell you in writing what will break first, what it costs to fix, and what to ignore.
The full path — questions, stack, architecture, services, data flow, integrations, cluster and handover. We take responsibility for the result, not for a number of hours.
After handover: operations, monitoring and continued development of a cluster you own, so your team can stay on the things only they can do.
That is the normal starting position, and working it out is our job. Describe the business and the symptom — we will tell you which of these applies, including when the answer is “none of them”.